🔍 Read the full analysis: 52 Companies Mention Humanoid Robots In SEC Filings. History Offers A Caution on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Prime made for students and young adults
- Fast, free delivery for dorm and study essentials
- Prime Video and Amazon Music included
- Member-only deals
TL;DR
A review of SEC EDGAR filings found 52 companies mentioning humanoid robots from Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026, compared with 17 in all of 2025 and six in 2024. The mentions range from robot makers to suppliers and blank-check companies, so the count does not show how many robots are being built, sold or deployed.
A review of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings found 52 companies mentioning humanoid robots from Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026, up from 17 in all of 2025 and six in 2024. The count captures a growing corporate focus on the technology, but the filings show that many companies are suppliers, prospective customers or investors rather than robot makers with established sales.
The tally, published by ThorstenMeyerAI.com on Nov. 2, is based on the site’s own search of the SEC’s EDGAR database. It found 163 filings and 186 matching documents from 52 company registrants. The search covered 10-K annual reports, 10-Q quarterly reports, 8-K current reports and S-1 registration statements, including amendments and exhibits. It counted the word “humanoid,” not only the exact phrase “humanoid robot.”
The site’s classification of the companies is its own reading of the filings: nine build, sell or own a humanoid maker; 31 are suppliers, potential customers or companies citing the market; six are blank-check companies seeking acquisitions; and six mention humanoids in passing. Faraday Future alone accounted for 35 filings in the count. The site said the gap between its total and Inc.’s report of 47 companies likely reflects differences in filing forms and the dates searched.
The disclosures describe businesses at very different stages. The report says Faraday Future recorded $853,000 in second-quarter robotics revenue from humanoid and four-legged robots combined. It also says the company that bought Faraday’s robot business expects more than 1,100 cumulative shipments, while a prospectus filed seven weeks earlier listed two paid orders, worth about $5,000 combined, for its robot-sharing platform. Those figures cover different entities and measures; they do not establish that the projected shipments have occurred.
Infographic 01 · The word is spreading
52 companies said “humanoid” in SEC filings this year
We ran the search ourselves: three times as many companies as in all of 2025, and almost nine times as many as in 2024.
Companies mentioning “humanoid”
10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, S-1 incl. amendments and exhibits, by filing year (2026: to 1 Nov)
The blockchain wave
Companies mentioning “blockchain” in the same forms
Mentions did not fall after the 2018 crypto crash. A rising count alone is not a bubble signal; the gap between words and business is.
How we counted
- Query: humanoid (catches “robot”, “robots”, “robotics”). The exact phrase “humanoid robot” alone: 18 companies.
- Forms: 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, S-1, each with amendments; every matching document, including exhibits.
- Period: filing dates 1 Jan to 1 Nov 2026; earlier years by calendar year.
- Counting: one company per SEC registrant number (CIK). Faraday Future alone: 35 of 163 filings.
- Inc. reported 47 companies. Likely a different form set or date window; same direction.
Source: SEC EDGAR full-text search, run 2 Nov 2026 (an all-forms search finds 272 entities, mostly investment funds listing humanoid-robotics ETFs; excluded). Tip: Inc., 1 Nov 2026.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Filings Show Uneven Robot Exposure
The rise in mentions is a useful signal of how companies are positioning themselves around a prominent technology market. It is not, on its own, a measure of commercial adoption. A supplier listing humanoids alongside drones, data centers and satellites as possible growth markets has made a different disclosure from a company reporting customer orders, revenue or robots operating at a facility.
That distinction matters to readers trying to understand what corporate enthusiasm means in practice. The report identifies some more concrete disclosures: component maker Vishay Precision said it received a vendor nomination letter from an initial humanoid-robotics customer. Agility Robotics reported nine customer facilities and 65,000 hours of operation, according to the article. Those are specific indicators, but they do not establish the sector’s overall scale or profitability.
The source also points to examples of earlier technology-related promotional waves, including dot-com-era company name changes and a beverage company that pivoted toward blockchain. These are cautionary comparisons, not proof that current humanoid-robotics companies are misleading investors. The report says the SEC brought AI-washing cases in 2024 and 2025, including one involving a startup that promised a humanoid home robot; it does not establish that the companies in this filing count have violated securities rules.
Products Worth Considering
LG UltraGear 27GX704A-B 27-inch QHD OLED Gaming Monitor
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Wireless Noise-Cancelling Headphones with Spatial Audio, Black
DJI Mic 3 Wireless Microphone System (2 Transmitters, 1 Receiver, Charging Case)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Filing Count Was Built
The count followed an Inc. column published Nov. 1 with the headline “47 Companies Are Mentioning Humanoid Robots in SEC Filings. History Says That’s a Red Flag.” ThorstenMeyerAI.com said the column prompted its own search, but that Inc. was not its data source. The search was run on Nov. 2 using EDGAR full-text search and filing dates from Jan. 1 to Nov. 1, 2026, with the same forms checked for earlier years.
The method counts one company per SEC registrant number and one filing per accession number, regardless of how many matching documents it contains. Searching all form types returned 272 entities, the report said, largely because investment funds’ holdings lists included humanoid-robotics exchange-traded funds. The authors excluded those entities from their 52-company tally. Their count is therefore a defined sample, not a census of every business or fund that may have mentioned the technology.
The report’s examples also underline how different the underlying claims can be. Tesla said Optimus production had begun in Fremont, but the source noted that the filing did not give unit numbers. Mobileye disclosed its $637 million purchase of Israeli humanoid startup Mentee Robotics, while other companies named humanoids as a potential market without reporting robot sales. The presence of a term in an SEC filing does not mean the company has the same level of involvement as these examples.
“A word in a filing is not a robot in a warehouse.”
— ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Mentions Do Not Measure Deployments
The tally does not establish how many humanoid robots have been produced, delivered or put to work across the companies mentioned. Nor does it show how much revenue the sector generates: the companies’ references include investment plans, supplier opportunities, market forecasts, acquisitions and incidental mentions. The report’s categories are based on its own reading, and the count depends on the selected search term, filing forms and date window.
Some individual figures also have limits. Faraday Future’s reported robotics revenue combines humanoid and four-legged robots, while the more than 1,100 figure is an expectation for cumulative shipments attributed to the acquiring company. The source does not provide enough detail here to reconcile that projection with the two paid platform orders disclosed in the earlier prospectus. Tesla’s reported start of Optimus production comes without unit numbers in the cited account. The scale, revenue and economics of the broader market remain unclear.
Watch for Orders and Operating Data
The next useful evidence will come from subsequent SEC filings and company disclosures that specify paid orders, shipment totals, revenue and customer deployments. Those details can help distinguish an operating business from a supplier’s forecast or a company’s stated interest in the market. Updates to the count will also depend on future filing dates and whether the same search method is used.
For now, the report offers a snapshot through Nov. 1, 2026, rather than a verdict on the technology or any company’s prospects. It says its review is based on public documents and is not investment advice. Readers should treat the 52-company figure as a count of mentions under the stated methodology, not as a count of humanoid-robot producers or proof of widespread commercial adoption.
Key Questions
What does the 52-company figure count?
It counts 52 SEC registrants with at least one matching 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K or S-1 filing dated Jan. 1 through Nov. 1, 2026, using an EDGAR search for “humanoid.”
Does every company in the count make humanoid robots?
No. The report classified nine companies as building, selling or owning a humanoid maker. Most were categorized as suppliers, potential customers, market references, blank-check companies or incidental mentions.
Why does the count differ from Inc.’s 47?
ThorstenMeyerAI.com said the difference likely reflects the filing forms and date window used. It conducted its own search and did not use Inc.’s figure as its source.
Does the count prove humanoid robots are being widely deployed?
No. A filing mention does not establish production, paid sales or deployment. The report cites some operating data, including Agility Robotics’ reported nine customer facilities and 65,000 operating hours, but it does not measure deployment across the entire group.
What evidence would clarify the market’s progress?
Future disclosures of completed shipments, paid customer orders, revenue and operating deployments would provide more direct evidence than references to humanoids as a potential market.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
